Original Paper

Pdf file on Synergy

omments

Acta Biochim Biophys Sin 2007, 39: 366-376

doi:10.1111/j.1745-7270.2007.00291.x

Ligands of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor inhibit Homocysteine-induced DNA Methylation of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase

 

yideng Jiang1*, jianzhong Zhang1, Jiantuan Xiong1, jun Cao1, Guizhong Li1, and Shuren Wang2

 

1 Department of Pathology, Ningxia Medical College, Yinchuan 750004, China;

2 Department of Pathophysiology, West China College of Preclinical and Forensic Medical Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China

 

Received: January 22, 2007       

Accepted: March 12, 2007

This work was supported by a grant form the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (No. 20050610050)

*Corresponding Author: Tel, 86-951-4083421; Fax, 86-951-4081245; E-mail, jwcjyd@163.com

 

Abstract        Homocysteine (Hcy) is a risk factor for atherosclerosis. It is generally accepted that inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) is a key enzyme in the regulation of vascular disease. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ligands on iNOS in the presence of Hcy in human monocytes. Foam cells, induced by oxidize low density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) and phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) in the presence of different concentrations of Hcy, clofibrate and pioglitazone in human monocytes for 4 d, were examined by oil red O staining. The activity of iNOS was detected by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analysis. The capability of DNA methylation was measured by assaying endogenous C5 DNA methyltransferase (C5MTase) activity, and the iNOS promoter methylation level was determined by quantitative MethyLight assays. The results indicated that Hcy increased the activity of C5MTase and the level of iNOS gene DNA methylation, resulting in a decrease of iNOS expression. Clofibrate and pioglitazone could antagonize the hcy effect on iNOS expression through DNA methylation, resulting in attenuation of iNOS transcription. These findings suggested that Hcy decreased the expression of iNOS by elevating iNOS DNA methylation levels, which can repress the transcription of some genes. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor a/g ligands can down-regulate iNOS DNA methylation, and could be useful for preventing Hcy-induced atherosclerosis by repressing iNOS expression.

 

Key words        homocysteine; DNA methyltransferase; PPARa/g ligand; iNOS DNA methylation

 

Homocysteine (Hcy) is a sulfur-containing amino acid form during the metabolism of methionine. Hyperho­mocysteine (HHcy) is found in 30% of patients with premature atherosclerosis of carotid and peripheral arteries [1]. Elevated plasma Hcy levels have been implicated as an independent risk factor for coronary heart diseases [2]. Evidences have also indicated that inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) is the key mechanism in the regulation of vascular diseases. However, strong associations among HHcy, iNOS and atherosclerosis have been observed in many studies [3].

The precise mechanisms of Hcy-induced atherosclerosis and iNOS anti-atherosclerosis are still to be fully investigated. Much attention has been focused on the impacts of HHcy on dysfunction and injury of vascular cells. Increasing evidence, however, indicates that HHcy might also be involved in the regulation of disturbing the expression of atherosclerosis-related genes through the interference of DNA methylation [4,5].

DNA methylation is a form of epigenetic gene regulation that leads to the suppression of gene expression when occurring in a regulatory region [6]. Some reports showed that it might be important for atherogenesis, which is at least partially regulated by DNA methylation. ApoE knockout mice and the neointima of balloon-denuded New Zealand White rabbit aortas [6] showed that significant genomic hypomethylation developed during the first replication of aortic smooth muscle cells (SMCs) in vivo, and that hypomethylation occurred in some specific genes, such as 15-lipoxygenase and extracellular superoxide dismutase, which have been indicated to be deeply involved in atherosclerosis [7,8]. This might result from a direct regulatory effect of hypomethylation on gene expression or from a secondary effect by affecting DNA integrity and function.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) have been implicated in macrophage biology, lipid homeostasis, and atherogenesis. In addition, it is generally accepted that iNOS is a key factor in the regulation of vascular disease [9,10]. Strong associations between PPARa/g ligands and iNOS in atherosclerosis have been observed in many studies [10-12]. But the precise anti-atherosclerotic mechanisms of PPARa/g ligands and the relationship between PPARa/g ligands and iNOS remain obscure. Taking into account that Hcy interferes with the earliest processes of lipid accumulation and metabolism [13], we examined the capacity of C5 DNA methyl­transferase (C5MTase) to transfer the methyl group to DNA and iNOS DNA promoter methylation status and the effects of PPARa/g ligands on iNOS DNA promoter methylation. The alteration of DNA methylation on iNOS might be an important finding that could point to a mechanism against atherosclerosis in which epigenetic gene silencing is a feature. The iNOS uncovered aberrations of DNA methylation induced by Hcy as well as the effects of PPARa/g ligands and the PPAR ligands pathways could be a potential target for anti-atherosclerosis therapy. These data for the first time indicate the effect of DNA methylation on the iNOS gene in the context of atherosclerosis.

 

 

Materials and Methods

 

Cell cultures

 

Human blood from a healthy donor was drawn into heparinized syringes. The whole blood was separated into peripheral blood mononuclear cells and neutrophils using the density gradient from Nycoprep 1.077 (Life Technologies, Chengdu, China), then the monocytes were isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells by adherence to a serum-coated culture flask for 2 h. Adherent cells were then detached and resuspended in RPMI-1640 medium containing 5% autologous plasma. Only cell preparations with a 95% viability or greater were used. The cells were planted into 6-well plates and grown to 80% confluence. Serum was deprived for 4 d cell synchronicity. The cells were then cultured with 0.5 mg/ml phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) together with 100 mg/ml oxidize low density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) and different concentrations of Hcy, and clofibrate (5 mM) and pioglitazone (10 mM).

 

Oil red O stained foam cells

 

The cultured monocytes were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) three times and fixed in 2.5% glutardialdehyde for 3 h, dipped in 2.5% potassium dichromate for 16 h, and stained in 1% oil red O (Sigma-Aldrich) for 20 min to identify lipid droplets in cytoplasm. Cell nuclei were then stained in hematoxylin for 15 s. All products were washed with distilled H2O. monocyte-derived foam cells were observed. Semi-quantitative analysis of foam cells was evaluated by the percentage of positive oil red O staining cells.

 

Endogenous C5MTase activity

 

A modification of the assay developed by Hattori et al. [14] was used to determine DNA MTase activity. A total of 1107 cells was scraped from plates, pooled into ice-cold PBS and collected by centrifugation. The cells were suspended in 500 ml lysis buffer, then lysed by four cycles of freezing at -70 șC and thawing at 37 șC. Protein concentration was determined by the Bradford assay. Cell lysates containing 5 mg protein were mixed with 0.5 mg poly[dI-dC]poly[dI-dC] and 1.5 mM S-adenosyl-L-[methyl-3H] methionine in a total volume of 20 ml and incubated at 37 șC for 2 h. The reactions were terminated by adding 300 ml of stop solution (1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 2 mM EDTA, 5% 2-propanol, 125 mM NaCl, 1 mg/ml Proteinase K, 0.25 mg/ml carrier DNA) for 1 h at 37 șC. The DNA was extracted with phenol-chloroform and ethanol precipitated. The recovered DNA was resuspended in 30 ml of 0.3 M NaOH and incubated for 30 min at 37 șC. DNA was spotted on GF/C filter discs (Whatman, Shanghai, China) and dried. Filters were placed in scintillation vials and incubated for 1 h at 60 șC with 500 ml of 0.5 M perchloric acid. Then 5 ml of scintillation cocktail was added and radioactive 3H incorporation into DNA was assessed using a liquid scintillation counter (Beckman Coulter, Shanghai, China).

 

Real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

 

Genomic RNA was isolated from the cultured cells by the E.Z.N.A Tissue RNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek). RNA was reversely transcribed by the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (MBI) in a final volume of 20 ml containing 5 ml RNA, 3 ml oligo dT primer, and 12 ml DEPC-treated water. The mixture was incubated at 70 șC for 10 min, then put on ice. Four microliters 5 reaction buffer, 1 ml ribonuclease inhibitor (recombinant; 20 u/ml), 2 ml dNTP mix, and 1 ml RevertAid M-MuLV Reverse Transcriptase (200 u/ml) were added and incubated at 20 șC for 10 min, then incubated at 48 șC for 60 min. cDNA was used for PCR.

Primers of iNOS (GenBank accession No. AF440783) were designed with Primer Premier 5.0 software. The forward primer was 5'-CTATGTAGCCCTAGTTTGTCC-3', the reverse primer was 5'-GTGGTAGATTG­GC­GT­GAC-3' and the probe primer was 5'-6-FAM-AGTC­GTGT­CGGGATGGGTGA-TAMRA-3'. Real-time PCR was carried out using an iCycler iQ real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA) with the program running for 40 cycles at 95 șC for 45 s, 60 șC for 60 s and 72 șC for 120 s. The melting curve analysis was carried out at the range 55 șC -95 șC by monitoring 6-FAM fluorescence with increasing temperature (0.5 șC increments at 10 s intervals). PCR-specific products were determined by clear single peaks at the melting curves above 80 șC. Real-time PCR was duplicated for each cDNA sample. Each gene RNA level was acquired from the value of the threshold cycle (Ct) of the real-time PCR related to that of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; calibrator) through the formula DCt [DCt=CtGAPDH (calibrator)-Ctsample]. Final results, expressed as N-fold differences in target gene expression relative to the calibrator, termed "Ntarget", were determined as follows: NiNOS=2DCt(sample)-DCt(calibrator).

 

Western blot analysis of iNOS

 

Total protein was extracted from the cultured monocytes and analyzed by Western blotting [15,16]. Briefly, cultured cells were harvested by scraping with a plastic scraper. Extracts of whole cells (5106) were isolated from cell culture by lysis buffer. Protein concentrations were determined by Coomassie Protein Assay. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (7%-19% polyacrylamide gradient gels) was followed by electrophoretic transfer of proteins from the gel to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was incubated in 10 ml of blocking solution (0.1 ml/cm2) for 2 h at room temperature with gentle agitation on a platform shaker, and washed three times for 5 min each in TBST solution (50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 150 mm NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20). The membrane was then incubated with a monoclonal anti-iNOS antibody (at 1:250 dilution) in 10 ml primary antibody dilution buffer with gentle agitation at 4 șC, then washed three times with TBST solution, and incubated with secondary antibody goat anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated immunoglobulin G (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, USA) in PBS at 1:2000 dilution containing 1% bovine serum albumin for 1 h at room temperature. After being washed again three times with TBST solution, the membrane was incubated with 10 ml LumiGLO solution (New England Biolabs, Beverly, USA) with gentle agitation for 1 min at room temperature. Excess developing solution was drained out, but the membrane was not dried. It was wrapped in plastic and exposed to X-ray film.

 

iNOS promoter methylation analysis

 

Bisulfite conversion and DNA recovery    Bisulfite modification was carried out using the EZ DNA Methylation Kit (Zymo Research, Orange, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. The bisulfite-treated DNA was isolated using the Wizard DNA Clean-Up System (Promega, Madison, USA). The DNA was eluted by 50 ml of warm water and 5.5 ml of 3 M NaOH was added and allowed to stand for 5 min. The DNA was ethanol precipitated with glycogen as a carrier and resuspended in 20 ml of water.

Standard curve    Peripheral blood leukocyte (PBL) DNA was used as a substrate for M.SssI treatment as described by the manufacturer [17]. PBL DNA (0.05 mg/ml) was incubated with M.SssI at a concentration of 1 U/mg DNA (0.05 U/ml) and 0.16 mM AdoMet (Sigma-Aldrich) overnight at 37 șC. Then extra AdoMet (to 0.20 mM) and M.SssI (to 0.065 U/ml) were added followed by a second overnight incubation at 37 șC. The sample was stored at 4 șC. To generate unmethylated human DNA as control samples for testing the MethyLight reactions, sperm and PBL DNA were amplified using a WGA kit (Molecular Staging, New Haven, USA) as described by the manufacturer. The unmethylated and methylated DNA were then treated with bisulfite and recovered as described above. The following ratios were prepared (methylated/unmethylated): 0/100, 10/90, 25/75, 50/50, 75/25, 90/10 and 100/0. each sample was examined by real-time PCR analysis in duplicate. We correlated the DCt values with the predefined prevalence of methylated alleles. The curve had a sigmoid shape with a linear part in the range of 10%-90% of methylated DNA. From this we deduced an algorithm to calculate the methylation ratio of an unknown sample from its DCt value.

MethyLight reactions and methylation calculations    We carried out a novel quantitative analysis of methylated alleles that is essentially a major improvement over a previous method based on real-time PCR (MethyLight) [18]. We used a VIC-labeled probe that specifically hybridizes to the sequence derived from the methylated allele, and a FAM-labeled probe that binds to the sequence generated from the unmethylated allele. The amount of fluorescent dye released during PCR is measured by a real-time PCR system and is directly proportional to the amount of PCR product generated. The binding site of the probes covers three differently methylated CpG dinucleotides. Their improved sequence specificity facilitates relative quantification of methylated and unmethylated alleles that are simultaneously amplified in a single tube.

PCR primers were designed to amplify the bisulfite-converted antisense strand of the iNOS sequence. The PCR primers and probes and the strategy for designing the MethyLight reaction are listed in Fig. 1. The PCR was carried out using a 96-well optical tray with caps at a final reaction volume of 20 ml. Samples contained 10 ml of TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Bio-Rad), 2 ml of bisulfite-treated DNA, 2.5 mM each of the iNOS forward primer and PPARa/g reverse primer and 150 nM each of the fluorescently labeled probes iNOS met and unmet. Initial denaturation at 95 șC for 5 min to activate the AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase was followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 șC for 15 sec and annealing and extension at 60 șC for 1 min.

The MethyLight data specific for the methylated iNOS gene were expressed as the percentage of methylated reference values and the percentage of unmethylated reference values, and calculated similarly to a recent report [19], but with the following changes. The percentage of methylated DNA molecules in a real-time PCR experiment is given by c, DCt=Ct-FAM-Ct-HEX=Log2[c/(1-c)]. To account for the differential efficacy of the PCR (methylated/unmethylated) and probe activity, we restate the model as DCt=a+bLog2[c/(1-c)], with a and b representing the additional effects. The following equation was deduced from the results generated by the standard curve, c=100/[1+2[(2-DCt)/-0.68], a=2 and b=0.68. Each MethyLight reaction was carried out between three and six times, and the data shown are the mean percentage of methylated reference values or the mean percentage of unmethylated reference values of the three measurements.

 

Statistical analysis

 

Results are expressed as mean±SEM. The data were analyzed using one-way anova and additional analysis used Student-Newman-Keuls test for multiple comparisons within treatment groups or Student's t-test for between two groups. P<0.05 was considered significant.

 

 

Results

 

effect of Hcy on foam cells derived from monocytes

 

Fig. 2 shows the effects when foam cells were induced after 4 d incubation with PMA and ox-LDL, 0, 50, 100, 200 or 500 mm Hcy, and clofibrate and pioglitazone in monocytes. A great number of foam cells were found by oil red O staining. The foam cells cultured with various concentrations of Hcy (50 to 500 mM) for 4 d were significantly elevated compared with the control (P<0.05). Hcy at 100 mm produced the highest stimulation of foam cells (P<0.001), indicating that Hcy is important for foam cell formation. The role of the addition of clofibrate and pioglitazone were further tested that they can decrease foam cell formation (P<0.05).

 

Endogenous C5MTase activity

 

To determine whether Hcy is able to induce changes in C5MTase in human monocytes, the monocytes were cultured with PMA and ox-LDL as well as different concentrations of Hcy, and clofibrate and pioglitazone. The endogenous C5MTase activity is shown in Fig. 3. Hcy up-regulated the activity of C5MTase, with maximum activity at a concentration of 100 mm Hcy (p<0.01, compared with the control group). The other experimental groups also showed significant elevation of C5MTase activities (p<0.05). The cells cultured with clofibrate and pioglitazone decreased the activity of C5MTase in cultured monocytes within 4 d (p<0.05, compared with the ox-LDL+PMA+Hcy group).

 

Effect of Hcy on iNOS RNA and protein expressions

 

To determine whether Hcy and PPARa/g ligands modulate the expression of iNOS mRNA, total RNA was isolated from the cultured monocytes treated with Hcy at different concentrations, clofibrate and pioglitazone. After normalization against GAPDH mRNA, the mRNA level of iNOS was down-expressed in all Hcy-treated groups compared with the control group (P<0.05). The decrease in the levels of iNOS mRNA after incubation with 100 mm Hcy reached the maximum when cultured monocytes were incubated with Hcy (50500 mm) for 4 d. But the increasing concentrations of Hcy did not result in dose-dependent decreasing effects on mRNA levels of iNOS. There was no significant difference in mRNA expression of iNOS between the experimental groups. PPARa/g ligands also increased iNOS production (Fig. 4).

The effects of Hcy on the protein levels of iNOS were measured by Western blot analysis, and showed a result similar to that of iNOS mRNA expression. The lowest protein expression of iNOS was also at a concentration of 100 mM Hcy, and there was no significant difference in iNOS protein levels between various dosages of Hcy. PPARa/g ligands increased iNOS protein expression. These results show that PPARa/g ligands not only reduced the production of iNOS protein but also iNOS mRNA levels in cultured human monocytes (Fig. 5).

 

Hcy-induced iNOS methylation changes

 

To explore the possible role of the Hcy and PPARa/g ligands in iNOS methylation levels, the methylation status of the iNOS promoter region was investigated in cultured monocytes. Using a quantitative TaqMan-based real-time PCR, it was found that an increase in Hcy dose (50, 100, 200 and 500 mM) led to a significant increase in iNOS DNA methylation by 31%, 87%, 32% and 50%, respectively (p<0.05), and decrease in clofibrate and pioglitazone 32% and 64% compared with the control, and 26% and 61% compered to 100 mM Hcy (Fig. 6) by 32%, 26% and 64%, 61% (p<0.01). These findings suggested that DNA methylation played a role in iNOS expression observed in human monocytes.

 

 

Discussion

 

Atherosclerosis has been viewed as bland deposits of excess lipid in the vascular wall, but mounting evidence has redefined them as dynamic sites of chronic inflammation [20,21]. Considerable epidemiological evidence has identified Hcy as a risk factor for arteriosclerosis, but the mechanisms of Hcy-induced atherosclerosis have been linked to inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis. Increasing evidence, however, indicates that HHcy might also be involved in disturbing the expression of atherosclerosis-related genes through the interference of DNA methylation [22,23].

Previous studies have reported the effects of Hcy-induced DNA methylation in vascular SMCs (VSMCs) [24,25]. However, our experiments showed that Hcy not only promoted C5MTase activity but also induced DNA hypermethylation of the iNOS gene promoter and the downgrade of iNOS expression in foam cells derived from monocytes. We also showed that PPARa/g ligands decreased activity of DNA MTase and down-regulated iNOS DNA methylation, which repressed iNOS expression, resulting in anti-atherosclerosis. This finding has important clinical implications, and is supported by the following evidence. First, the plasma concentration of Hcy in patients suffering from homocystinuria is as high as 500 mm [26,27]. Patients with plasma Hcy levels >50 mm are at increased risk for vascular disorders [28,29]. This is in the range used in the present study. Second, in the present study, we have also produced insights regarding the mechanisms responsible for Hcy-induced iNOS promoter region DNA methylation in foam cells derived from monocytes.

Although the molecular mechanism underlying Hcy-induced atherosclerosis has been the subject of intensive investigation, most previous studies have focused on the influence of Hcy on endothelial cells and VSMCs [30,31]. Recent studies have shown that Hcy might also act directly on the immune cells to initiate and promote the progression of atherosclerosis [32,33]. Holven et al. [34] suggested that Hcy might exert its atherogenic effect by enhancing the inflammatory response. Similarly, Hcy might work through a new mechanism involving the up-regulation of iNOS DNA methylation, especially in the development of atherosclerotic plaque in patients with vascular disorders [35]. This should provide new insight to our understanding of Hcy-induced atherosclerosis.

We tested C5MTase activity, which acted as a mediator in Hcy-induced DNA methylation, and found that Hcy (=50 mm) elevated C5MTase activity. A great difference between Hcy and cysteine is a one-carbon methyl group transfer metabolism, which involves the Hcy, but not the cysteine. The transmethylation modulation of genomic DNA (gDNA) is a very important epigenetic way for the regulation of gene expression, and has been shown to involve the expression of some atherosclerosis-related genes. In this cycle, the methyl-group for gDNA modification is catalyzed by DNA methyltransferase. After the methyl-group is transferred to DNA or other target compounds, the produced S-adenosylhomocysteine is then hydrolyzed to Hcy. Hcy can be recycled to methionine, or be eliminated by other metabolic ways. An abnormal increased Hcy concentration might interfere with this cycle, and result in feedback impacts on DNA MTase and the methylation status of gDNA. In the present study, we have found that C5MTase activity can be triggered by the Hcy range of 50500 mm. It has been reported that MTase activity in cancer tissue was actually increased in spite of the genome-wide hypomethylation [36]. MTase activity can be seen as a compensatory mechanism to maintain the genomic methylation pattern. Our unpublished data suggest that the Hcy level significantly increases MTase activity both in VSMCs and monocytes.

Second, we have distinguished the expression of iNOS. The present study has provided evidence that iNOS is the major enzyme responsible for Hcy-induced atherogenesis, our results indicating that iNOS protein expression was induced by Hcy in foam cells derived from monocytes. iNOS is believed to produce low amounts of NO to execute physiological and/or anti-inflammatory functions. The inflammation-associated expression of iNOS and the subsequent overproduction of NO are assumed to be responsible for the cardiovascular failure [37]. The results also showed that iNOS promoter was hypermethylated after Hcy treatment. A reasonable explanation is that increasing concentrations of Hcy increases the intracellular ratio of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM)/S-adenosylhomocysteine and stimulates DNMT activity that the methyl group of SAM transfers to iNOS. Increased iNOS gene promoter hypermethylation is silenced in association with the CpG-island methylation. for this reason, lowered iNOS expression is a reasonable, and easy, explanation [38,39]. But the result of decreased iNOS expression levels contradicts the report by Woo et al. [40]. A potential, yet plausible explanation is that there are differences in iNOS expression between foam cells and macrophages. In many mechanisms involved in the synthesis of iNOS in the process of foam cell development, in which iNOS promoter DNA methylation might be predominant, iNOS replication was repressed by promoter hypermethylation.

Furthermore, some evidence has indicated that PPARa/g ligands reduce inflammation and anti-atherosclerosis [3]. However, our data have shown that PPARa/g ligands can partially block Hcy-induced C5MTase activity and are involved in the mechanism of Hcy-induced DNA methylation in cultured human monocytes. This is consistent with the fact that PPARa/g ligands have an anti-atherosclerotic effect in cultured VSMCs. PPARa/g ligands play an important role in transferring the methyl group to DNA or other target compounds [41]. we have also examined the effects of PPARa/g ligands on Hcy-induced response to iNOS, and showed that PPARa/g ligands clearly inhibited Hcy-induced iNOS in cultured human monocytes. These results suggest that Hcy-induced iNOS can be regulated by peroxisome proliferators [42], and the activation of PPARa/g might have beneficial effects in patients with atherosclerotic disorders.

The dosage of Hcy used in the present study is clinically relevant, from moderate hyperhomocysteinemia (Hcy concentration of 100 mm, found in up to 40% of patients with myocardial infarction, stroke, or venous thrombosis) to severe hyperhomocysteinemia (Hcy concentration of 500 mm, found in patients with inherited homocystinuria). The impacts of various concentrations of Hcy on the one-carbon methyl group transfer metabolism, however, did not show a dose-effect relationship. The highest effects on aberrant methylation of iNOS and the factors involved in the pathway of DNA methylation and the SAM cycle were at the Hcy concentration of 100 mm. Increased Hcy concentrations, on the contrary, exert weaker effects on the aberrant methylation of iNOS and involved factors. This was unexpected, but might be reasonable. Hyperhomocysteinemia has been found to be associated with many deleterious effects, including pro-apoptosis on endothelial cells, promoting proliferation of VSMCs, activating some inflammatory pathways and coagulation cascades, even mediating cholesterol dysregulation. Hcy concentrations higher than 100 mm might exert more direct injurious effects, such as oxidative stress and apoptosis, whereas moderate hyperhomocysteinemia might have a milder impact on epigenetic modulation of gene expression [43]. There is a proliferation of SMCs at the level of 100 mm Hcy, but viable cell counts progressively reduce in Hcy concentrations of 200 mm and above. This phenomenon suggests that the varied detrimental effects of Hcy could be attributed to different concentrations by different mechanisms. In mild and moderate hyperhomocysteinemia, Hcy might primarily influence the epigenetic regulation of gene expression through the interference of methyl group transfer metabolism, whereas in higher Hcy concentrations, the essential impacts might be more directly injurious through oxidative stress, pro-apoptosis, and inflammation.

Our findings uncovered Hcy-induced hypermethylation in the iNOS promoter and increased activity of DNA MTase, similar to the fingding in cancer tissues. It is possible that alterations in iNOS promoter hypermethylation play an important role in atherogenesis. However, there is no proven direct relationship between iNOS promoter hypermethylation and atherogenesis, there might simply be an association between these two processes, but our findings also suggested that different concentrations of Hcy exert different effects through different mechanisms. Therefore, interventions directed towards HHcy should be more specific, taking into account the Hcy concentration in each case and related mechanisms, for the treatment of vascular disorders in the treatment of vascular disorders. PPARa/g ligands clearly inhibit Hcy-induced iNOS. The induction of iNOS promoter hypermethylation by HHcy and the anti-atherosclerotic effect of PPARa/g ligands is a new, hitherto unreported element of their mechanisms. These findings reveal a novel role for Hcy in the pathogenesis of human vascular disease.

 

 

References

 

 1    Turhan H, Erbay AR, Yasar AS, Bicer A, Sahin O, Basar N, Yetkin E. Plasma homocysteine levels in patients with isolated coronary artery ectasia. Int J Cardiol 2005, 104: 158-162

 2    Van Eck M, Van Dijk KW, Herijgers N, Hofker MH, Groot PH, Van Berkel TJ. Essential role for the (hepatic) LDL receptor in macrophage apolipoprotein E-induced reduction in serum cholesterol levels and atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2001, 154: 103-112

 3    Yla-Herttuala S, Nikkari T, Hirvonen J, Laaksonen H, Mottonen M, Pesonen E, Raekallio J et al. Biochemical composition of coronary arteries in Finnish children. Arteriosclerosis 1986, 6: 230-236

 4    Feinberg AP, Tycko B. The history of cancer epigenetics. Nat Rev Cancer 2004, 45: 143-153

 5    Greger V, Passarge E, Hopping W, Messmer E, Horsthemke B. Epigenetic changes may contribute to the formation and spontaneous regression of retinoblastoma. Hum Genet 1989, 83: 155-158

 6    Jones PA, Baylin SB. The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer. Nat Rev Genet 2002, 3: 415-428

 7    Mayer W, Niveleau A, Walter J, Fundele R, Haaf T. Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome. Nature 2000, 403: 501-502

 8    Torra IP, Chinetti G, Duval C, Fruchart JC, Staels B. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: from transcriptional control to clinical practice. Curr Opin Lipidol 2001, 12: 245-254

 9    Kirkeboen KA, Strand OA. The role of nitric oxide in sepsis-an overview. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999, 43: 275-288

10   Ortega Mateo A, Amaya Aleixandre de Artinano M. Nitric oxide reactivity and mechanisms involved in its biological effects. Pharmacol Res 2000, 42: 421-427

11   Chui PC, Guan HP, Lehrke M, Lazar MA. PPARgamma regulates adipocyte cholesterol metabolism via oxidized LDL receptor 1. J Clin Invest 2005, 115: 2244-2256

12   Escames G, Lopez LC, Tapias V, Utrilla P, Reiter RJ, Hitos AB, Leon J et al. Melatonin counteracts inducible mitochondrial nitric oxide synthase-dependent mitochondrial dysfunction in skeletal muscle of septic mice. J Pineal Res 2006, 40: 71-78

13   van den Brandhof WE, Haks K, Schouten EG, Verhoef P. The relation between plasma cysteine, plasma homocysteine and coronary atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2001, 157: 403-409

14   Hattori N, Abe T, Hattori N, Suzuki M, Matsuyama T, Yoshida S, Li E, Shiota K. Preference of DNA methyltransferases for CpG islands in mouse embryonic stem cells. Genome Res 2004, 14: 1733-1740

15   Aratani S, Fujii R, Oishi T, Fujita H, Amano T, Ohshima T, Hagiwara M et al. Dual roles of RNA helicase A in CREB-dependent transcription. Mol Cell Biol 2001, 21: 4460-4469

16   Sekimata M, Takahashi A, Murakami-Sekimata A, Homma Y. Involvement of a novel zinc finger protein, MIZF, in transcriptional repression by interacting with a methyl-CpG-binding protein, MBD2. J Biol Chem 2001, 276: 42632-42638

17   Bibikova M, Lin Z, Zhou L, Chudin E, Garcia EW, Wu B, Doucet D et al. High-throughput DNA methylation profiling using universal bead arrays. Genome Res 2006, 16: 383-393

18   Ying AK, Hassanain HH, Roos CM, Smiraglia DJ, Issa JJ, Michler RE, Caligiuri M et al. Methylation of the estrogen receptor-alpha gene promoter is selectively increased in proliferating human aortic smooth muscle cells. Cardiovasc Res 2000, 46: 172-179

19   Weisenberger DJ, Campan M, Long TI, Kim M, Woods C, Fiala E, Ehrlich M et al. Analysis of repetitive element DNA methylation by MethyLight. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33: 6823-6836

20   Fong IW. Emerging relations between infectious diseases and coronary artery disease and atherosclerosis. CMAJ 2000, 163: 49-56

21   de Boer OJ, van der Wal AC, Becker AE. Atherosclerosis, inflammation, and infection. J Pathol 2000, 190: 237-243

22   Feinberg AP, Tycko B. The history of cancer epigenetics. Nat Rev Cancer 2004, 4: 143-153

23   Greger V, Passarge E, Hopping W, Messmer E, Horsthemke B. Epigenetic changes may contribute to the formation and spontaneous regression of retinoblastoma. Hum Genet 1989, 83: 155-158

24   Hiltunen MO, Turunen MP, Hakkinen TP, Rutanen J, Hedman M, Makinen K, Turunen AM et al. DNA hypomethylation and methyltransferase expression in atherosclerotic lesions. Vasc Med 2002, 7: 5-11

25   Huang Y, Peng K, Su J, Huang Y, Xu Y, Wang S. Different effects of homocysteine and oxidized low density lipoprotein on methylation status in the promoter region of the estrogen receptor alpha gene. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin 2007, 39: 19-26

26   Mudd SH, Skovby F, Levy HL, Pettigrew KD, Wilcken B, Pyeritz RE, Andria G et al. The natural history of homocystinuria due to cystathionine beta-synthase deficiency. Am J Hum Genet 1985, 37: 1-31

27   Woo KS, Chook P, Lolin YI, Cheung AS, Chan LT, Sun YY, Sanderson JE et al. Hyperhomocyst(e)inemia is a risk factor for arterial endothelial dysfunction in humans. Circulation 1997, 96: 2542-2544

28   Mainlow MR. Hyperhomocyst(e)inemia. A common and easily reversible risk factor for occlusive atherosclerosis. Circulation 1990, 81: 2004-2006

29   Refsum H, Ueland PM. Recent data are not in conflict with homocysteine as a cardiovascular risk factor. Curr Opin Lipidol 1998, 9: 533-539

30   Poddar R, Sivasubramanian N, DiBello PM, Robinson K, Jacobsen DW. Homocysteine induces expression and secretion of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and interleukin-8 in human aortic endothelial cells: Implications for vascular disease. Circulation 2001, 103: 2717-2723

31   Sung FL, Slow YL, Wang G, Lynn EG, Karmin O. Homocysteine stimulates the expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in endothelial cells leading to enhanced monocyte chemotaxis. Mol Cell Biochem 2001, 216: 121-128

32   Zhang Q, Zeng X, Guo J, Wang X. Effects of homocysteine on murine splenic B lymphocyte proliferation and its signal transduction mechanism. Cardiovasc Res 2001, 52: 328-336

33   Zhang Q, Zeng X, Guo J, Wang X. Oxidant stress mechanism of homocysteine potentiating conA-induced proliferation in murine T lymphocytes. Cardiovasc Res 2002, 53: 1035–1042

34   Holven KB, Aukrust P, Holm T, Ose L, Nenseter MS. Folic acid treatment reduces chemokine release from peripheral blood mononuclear cells in hyperhomocysteinemic subjects. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002, 22: 699-703

35   Apostolopoulos J, Davenport P, Tipping PG. Interleukin-8 production by macrophages from atheromatous plaques. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1996, 16: 1007-1012

36   Kim YI, Christman JK, Fleet JC, Cravo ML, Salomon RN, Smith D, Ordovas J et al. Moderate folate deficiency does not cause global hypomethylation of hepatic and colonic DNA or c-myc-specific hypomethylation of colonic DNA in rats. Am J Clin Nutr 1995, 61: 1083-1090

37   Blanchette J, Jaramillo M, Olivier M. Signalling events involved in interferon-gamma-inducible macrophage nitric oxide generation. Immunology 2003, 108: 513-522

38   Gao J, Morrison DC, Parmely TJ, Russell SW, Murphy WJ. An interferon-gamma-activated site (GAS) is necessary for full expression of the mouse iNOS gene in response to interferon-gamma and lipopolysaccharide. J Biol Chem 1997, 272: 1226-1230

39   Gatto L, Berlato C, Poli V, Tininini S, Kinjyo I, Yoshimura A, Cassatella MA et al. Analysis of SOCS-3 promoter responses to interferon gamma. J Biol Chem 2004, 279: 13746-13754

40   Woo CW, Cheung F, Chan VW, Siow YL, Karmin O. Homocysteine stimulates inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in macrophages: Antagonizing effect of ginkgolides and bilobalide. Mol Cell Biochem 2003, 243: 37-47

41   Moore KJ, Rosen ED, Fitzgerald ML, Randow F, Andersson LP, Altshuler D, Milstone DS et al. The role of PPAR-gamma in macrophage differentiation and cholesterol uptake. Nat Med 2001, 7: 41-47

42   Hunt MJ, Tyagi SC. Peroxisome proliferators compete and ameliorate Hcy-mediated endocardial endothelial cell activation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2002, 283: 1073-1079

43   Counter CM, Avilion AA, LeFeuvre CE, Stewart NG, Greider CW, Harley CB, Bacchetti S. Telomere shortening associated with chromosome instability is arrested in immortal cells which express telomerase activity. EMBO J 1992, 11: 1921-1929