https://www.abbs.info
e-mail: [email protected]
ISSN 0582-9879 Acta Biochim et Biophysica Sinica 2004, 36(1):47-50 CN 31-1300/Q
Experimental Study of
Rat Beta Islet Cells Cultured under Simulated Microgravity Conditions
Chun SONG1,2*, Xiu-Qing DUAN2, Xi LI3, Li-Ou HAN2, Ping XU2, Chun-Fang SONG2 and Lian-Hong JIN4
( 1Key Laboratory of Cell
Transplantation of Ministry of Health, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin
Medical University, Harbin 150001, China;
2Department
of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University,
Harbin 150001, China;
3National
Key Laboratory of Harbin Veterinary Research Institute of Chinese Agriculture
Academy, Harbin 150001, China;
4Tissue
Engineering Research Center, Histology and Embryology Staff Room, Harbin
Medical University, Harbin 150086, China )
Abstract To observe the effects of simulated microgravity on beta
islet cell culture, the survival rates and the insulin levels of the isolated
rat islet cells cultured at the micro- and normal gravity conditions were
compared. The survival rates of the cells cultured were determined by acridine
orange-propidium iodide double-staining on day 3, 7 and 14. The morphology of
the cells was observed by electromicroscopy. Insulin levels were measured by
radioimmune assays. Our results show that the cell number cultured under the
microgravity condition is significantly higher than that under the routine
condition (P<0.01). Some tubular structure, possibly for the
transport of nutrients, were formed intercellularly in the microgravity
cultured group on day 7 after the cultivation shown by transmission
electromicroscopy. There were also abundant secretion particles and mitochondria
in the cytoplasma of the cells. Scanning electromicroscopy showed there were
holes formed between each islets, possibly the connecting points with the
nutrients transport tubules. The microgravity cultured group also has the
higher insulin levels in the media when compared with the control group (P<
0.01). Our results indicate that microgravity cultivation of islet cells has
advantages over the routine culture methods.
Key words simulated microgravity; islet cell; electron
microscopy; radioimmunoassay
Clinical and experimental evidence has shown that
adequate islet cells transplantation is an ideal approach to treat
insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. How to make islet cells three-dimensional
growth and differentiation, and become functional tissue in vitro, has
been a hot spot in investigations. The islet cell culture under microgravity
condition was studied here by using a rotary cell culture system (RCCS). The
survival rate, morphology and secretory function of the islet cells cultured in
this condition have been observed.
Materials and methods
Animals and reagents
Male Wistar rats, 250–300 g, were obtained from the
Experiment animal laboratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical
University. Hank’s solution and collagenase V were obtained from Gibco (USA),
and acridine orange (AO) and propidium iodide (PI) from Sigma (USA). RPMI-1640
medium and fetal calf serum were purchased from Hyclon (USA). Ficool-400
purified solution and dithizone (DTZ) were purchased from Sigma (America).
Insulin radio-immunity kit was obtained from Isotope graduate school, Chinese
Atomic Science Institute for research.
Experimental groups
Wistar rats were random divided into three groups. Group
I: control group, fresh islets (n=8); group II: flask-cultured (n=8);
group III: bioreactor-cultured (n=8). Each group was subjected to the
cultivation under normal gravity and the microgravity (RCCS, Synthecon, USA)
conditions.
Collagenase V preparation
5 mg collagenase V was dissolved in 2 ml Ca2+/Mg2+-free Hanks’
balanced salt solution supplemented with 100 u/ml penicillin and 100 mg/L
streptomycin.
Islet isolation and purification
Pancreas was exposed by aseptic operation and injected
with collagenase V on the multiple spot. Total pancreas was excised after
distended. Capsule was removed with scissors. Chopped pancreas tissues were
collected in gradient centrifuge tube with collagenase V and blew and beat
gently with pipette. The digest was shifted in the constant temperature incubator
at 37 ℃ (5% CO2), agitated
or blew and beat one time every 5 min and stopped with Hank’s solution (10%
calf serum) after 30 min and passed through a 600-mm mesh and then purified
using Ficool-400 density gradients after centrifuged. 250 g/L 4 ml, 230 g/L 2
ml, 200 g/L 2 ml and 110 g/L 2 ml Ficool-400 purified solution were added one
by one. 2 ml Hank’s solution was finally added. Islet cells from every two
interfaces besides 110 g/ L and Hank’s solution interfaces were collected after
centrifuged and washed two times in Hank’s solution. Pancreas was separated
into 50–350 mm many islet cell masses. The final cell pellet was resuspended in
RPMI-1640 culture medium with 20% fetal calf serum, 100 u/ml penicillin and 100
mg/L streptomycin, placed in culture flasks or RCCS besides fresh islets and
incubated at 37 ℃(5% CO2 and 95% air).
Islet identification
Islets were specifically stained by DTZ. 10 mg DTZ was
dissolved in absolute ethyl alcohol (50 ml concentrated NH4OH ),
supplemented with 12 ml Hank’s solution. Just before using, the preceding
solution was diluted with Hank’s solution (pH 7.8) by 1 to 100, passed through
a 0.22 mm filter membrane. Islet suspension was mixed with DTZ and placed 10
min and identified by light microscope.
Islet viability assessment and survival rate
Stock solution (AO: 670 mmol/L, PI: 750 mmol/L) was
prepared with Dulbeccos solution(isotonic phosphate buffer solution) and kept
in the dark place at 4 ℃. Just before
using, 0.01 ml AO and 1.0 ml PI were mixed, diluted by ten times with Dulbeccos
solution, passed through a 0.22 mm filter membrane, mixed 10 min with prepared
islet and observed and taken photograph by fluorescence microscope. Green (AO)
and red (PI) fluorescence were simultaneously seen at 510 nm grating light filter.
Islet survival rate cultured for days 3, 7 and 14 in stationary flaskes or
microgravity bioreactors was measured by AOPI double-staining. Islet survival
rate was showed with the percentage that live cells numbers were live cells and
died cells total amount. Each sample was repeatedly calculated four times, take
its average value [1].
Insulin level of culture fluids
Day 3, 7, 14, 21 and 30 islet cells culture fluids from
group II and group III were measured by radioimmunoassay.
Electron microscopy
Islet cells suspension cultured for 7 days from group II
or group III and from group I were respectively centrifuged and slowly added 3%
glutaraldehyde and observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and
scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Statistical analysis
Differences between islet survival rate were analyzed by
two sample rate u test. Unpaired Student’s t test was used to
analyze the differences between insulin level. P<0.05 was considered
to be statistically significant.
Results
Survival rates of islets
Islet survival rate in stationary flasks or microgravity
bioreactors was measured by AO-PI double-staining. The result showed that there
was significant difference between bioreactor-cultured and flask-cultured on
day 7 and 14 (P<0.01). There were more cells survived in the
Bioreactor cultivation group (Table 1).
Table 1 The different time survival rate of islet in
groupII and groupIII
|
Group |
3 |
7 |
14 |
||||||
|
Survival |
Death |
Survival |
Survival |
Death |
Survival |
Survival |
Death |
Survival |
|
|
Ⅱ |
4412 |
485 |
90 |
3449 |
1341 |
72 |
2528 |
1737 |
59 |
|
Ⅲ |
4408 |
459 |
90 |
4423 |
466 |
90* |
3496 |
823 |
80* |
*P<0.01 vs groupⅡ.
Insulin
levels in the culture fluids
Insulin level of day 3, 7, 14, 21 and 30 islet cells
culture fluids from group Ⅱ and group Ⅲ revealed that bioreactor-cultured were higher than
flask-cultured and bioreactor-cultured functioned better (Table 2).
Table 2 Insulin level of culture
fluids
|
Culture time (d) |
GroupⅡ |
GroupⅢ |
||
|
n |
Insulin (mu/L) |
n |
Insulin (mu/L) |
|
|
3 |
8 |
67.481±0.27 |
8 |
72.347±0.30 |
|
7 |
8 |
41.246±0.35 |
8 |
70.875±0.31* |
|
14 |
8 |
23.435±0.43 |
8 |
46.531±0.316* |
|
21 |
8 |
10.21±0.31 |
8 |
30.50±0.166* |
|
30 |
8 |
< 5.0 |
8 |
12.593±0.450* |
*P<0.01 vs groupⅡ. Data are represented as x±s
Islet morphology observation
The islet morphology observation are shown in Fig. 1–Fig.
6.
